A village is the antithesis of a civilized society. Why did the world urbanize? Because people wanted to leave the village environment in which everybody knew everybody else’s business. But as early as the 1970’s, Marshall McLuhan predicted that, thanks to modern mass media, we would all soon live in a global village. He was more correct than he knew. He was writing pre-Facebook and pre-Twitter.

McLuhan’s vision has been realized in spades. The busybodies are in the saddle. Billions of people are on Facebook, sharing the most intimate details of their lives with tens of millions of their closest “friends,” and being subjected to their “friend’s” details in return. And it gets worse; with Twitter, you receive an update on all this trivia minute by minute, your smartphone (which is smarter than you)  insistently dinging or buzzing like an angry wasp to force you to read the latest nonsense.

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Telepathy has now left the Ouija board and entered the real world. Some non-mad scientist neurophysiologists have successfuly connected two rats together using little thinking caps, and what Rat One thinks, Rat Two knows. And the connection wasn’t physical wires, joining them like robotic Siamese twins; it was a datalink mediated by the internet.  Let us think about the implications of this technology as it matures, as technologies are wont to do.

The first application, of course, will be cheating on tests. By implanting the transmitter and receiver in the mastoid bone behind your ear, you will be able to surreptitiously transmit each question to your buddies outside the examination room, who will either look up the answer on Google or calculate it using their supercomputer. And presto, as soon as they obtain it, their new knowledge of the correct answer will appear in your head. Everyone will have a 100% average in everything, and the average SAT score will rise to 2400.

But it gets much better. The fear and uncertainty that characterizes one’s entrance into a room full of strangers, say a cocktail party, convention session, or a holiday dinner with the family, will be a thing of the past. You will know immediately if the smile on the face of the lovely young lady or handsome young man across the room denotes interest or disbelief. You will know if the person walking down the street talking to no one at the top of his or her lungs is on the cell phone or suffers from Touretz Syndrome.

The nature of government will also change. Our masters will hire professional thinkers to think about the government’s orders and think them to us. They will also develop high-powered thinking transmitters which will overwhelm your personal thinking machine, ensuring that you only hear politically correct thoughts.

And think of the impact on advertising! You may be able to mute today’s TV commercials, but you won’t be able to block the thought bolts from Target and Subway, because the gummint will allow compliant companies (aka campaign contributors) to purchase the same high-powered brain wave transmitters that the government uses to brainwash you politically. You, of course, will not be permitted that luxury, since these transmitters will be denied to all but government officials and their sycophants, sort of like semi-automatic assault rifles.

Where will it all end? You will spend essentially all your time thinking somebody else’s thoughts. But the thoughts you receive will immediately become your thoughts, and hence will be re-transmitted to everybody else, who in turn will re-transmit them again, leading to an endless loop. Within a short period of time, your brain’s capacity will be exhausted, your head will explode, and you will be relieved from the unending cacaphonous din.

Thank Heaven for small favors!

Forget the romantic drug smuggling movies, filled with sophisticated villains driving Maseratis, swaggering down the Vegas strip with a supermodel on each arm, smoking Cuban cigars, sucking a fortune in white powder up their aquiline noses, dancing the night away with other sophisticates in posh nighteries, all with the proceeds from tunneling under the border with buckets of marijuana.

Things have changed for the worse. The drug smuggling method du jour is the cannon!

No, Dear Reader, this is not science fiction, nor the hallucinatory ramblings of a deranged mind (mine). The drug cartels have perfected air-powered cannons that shoot packages of drugs over the heads of oblivious border guards to a soft landing in the good old Estados Unidos, where they are picked up by the local distributors.

Talk about technological decline. (Well, not completely – a few months ago they were using catapults. Replacing the twelfth century catapult with the nineteenth century air gun is progress of a sort.) This is the 21st Century, for God’s sake! There are significantly better methods on the horizon.

Teleportation immediately springs to mind. Current research by non-mad physicists has reached the point at which light can be teleported. The cartels have mucho dinero. They should be funding improved teleportation research! Imagine shipping pot to New York without passing through Arizona or Texas or Illinois. How about teleporting directly to the ultimate consumer? The cartels’ profits would skyrocket, since they would no longer need to pay all those middlemen, corrupt DEA agents, and venal local police. There would be no more messy ripoffs to garner unfavorble publicity and blood-soaked hundred dollar bills.

How about going a stage further ; teleport the THC directly into the bloodstreams of the customers. It would provide a clear public health benefit, since the amount of lung damage produced by inhaling smoke from your joint is substantial.

How do the cartels collect their pittance if these methods are adopted? you well may ask. Simple. Ensure that the teleportation technology is bidirectional. If someone fails to pay up, you simply teleport his or her head back to Mexico. Separating heads from bodies has already been established as one of the cartels’ most popular and effective forms of discipline. This method is a bit reminescent of the eighteenth century guillotine, but I think that there is something to be said for preserving a little continuity to hold civilization together.

And this will only be the beginning! Soon this blossoming technology will be applied to other fun activities: putting ethyl alcohol directly into the bloodstream of drivers without requiring them to drink themselves into unconsciousness in  dingy barrooms; delivering campaign contributions directly into the pockets of politicians without leaving messy records in the banking system; etc. You get the idea.

You should have paid more attention in physics class.

Ah, the good old days! Beaver coats, pennants, bootleg hootch down at Mory’s, and the joyous singing of “Boola Boola” as the Yale football team crushed the pantywaists of Fair Harvard. Or got crushed. Who cared?

Well, it’s a century later, but the old fight song still has an eerie resonance. However, that resonance only comes when one substitutes the letter “M” for the letter “B.” The Yalies of the 1920’s were generally the idle sons of the disgustingly wealthy, collecting gentlemen’s C’s in the certain hope of going into Daddy’s investment banking house and making millions.

Millions HAH! I spit on millions!

Back in the 1960’s, Senator Everett Dirksen of Illinois, an elderly but still wonderful orator, remarked during a budget debate “A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you’re talking real money.” He thought he was making a joke, since a billion dollars was a lot of money. Then.

Billions HAH! I spit on billions!

The currency of the day is now TRILLIONS! I know you have read all the glib analyses demonstrating how large a trillion is by telling you how long it would take you to count to a trillion, about how high a pile of hundred dollar bills it would take to make a trillion dollars, etc. While they are somewhat illuminating, they don’t get to the heart of the matter. After all, you don’t generally count your money or pile it up just to gloat over how big the pile is (unless, of course, you are Uncle Scrooge McDuck, in which case you fill your swimming pool with it). No, you SPEND it. You are probably not in the market for fighter bombers or paying the salaries of teacher’s union presidents, so you don’t spend it several billion dollars at a time. But how much could you buy of the really important things? For a trillion dollars you could buy: a trillion Dunkin Donuts; 1,500,000 Lamborghinis; 25 million Priuses (or Prii, I suppose); 200 billion Starbucks mochachinos; thirteen billion pairs of jeans; twelve billion bottles of extremely expensive Scotch; and so on. You get the idea.

So taxes are in the trillions, government expenditures are in the trillions, total mortgage debt is in the trillions, the national debt is in the trillions, we are all in holes so deep we can never clamber out.

Which is actually great! You see, in the old days, an accountant at Sears once figured out a way to take all the fractions of a penny that showed up in the credits for interest on returned merchandise and transfer it to his own account. Since Sears had tens of millions of customers, he collected a tidy sum before he was hauled off to the hoosegow. But now the roundoff isn’t fractions of a penny– it’s fractions of a trillion dollars. So all we need to do is get a job at the data processing department of the Treasury, round off the figures to the nearest trillion, and transfer the remainder to our own account. If we do it once, we will end up with several hundred billion which we can transfer offshore.

Andorra has French food, beautiful people, a pleasant climate, and doesn’t have an extradition treaty with the U.S. What do you say?

“Dracula” was published in 1897 by Bram Stoker, whose day job was stage manager for the D’Oyly-Carte Opera Company, producers of the Gilbert and Sullivan comic operas. I suppose that endless days of light-hearted drollery drove him around the bend. But “Dracula” really rehabilitated the vampire. Up until that time, the vampire was viewed essentially as a foul-smelling wild animal slaking his thirst with blood to keep alive. Sort of like an Internal Revenue Service agent, only slightly less subtle. But Dracula was no wild animal — he was a sophisticated bloodsucker. No reflection, able to crawl down walls headfirst, true, but essentially an oversexed elderly Victorian gentleman, like the character played in the movie by Bela (“I never drink wine”) Lugosi. He was a hit with the ladies, because very young girls and dirty old men with money were a Victorian staple. But he was vulnerable to crosses, garlic, and a wooden stake through the heart.

That image held up through the time that I was a boy. (You are no doubt familiar with that time period, Dear Reader. That was when everybody walked three miles to and from school, uphill both ways, barefoot, in the snow.) But that all changed in 1976, when Ann Rice, most of whose work was classy pornography (which is not an oxymoron, strangely enough), wrote “Interview with the Vampire.” Her new vampires were not old farts; they were teenagers! Especially LeStat, who played in a rock band!

Teenaged protohumans loved it. Here were characters who lived forever and stayed up all night. They really knew how to give a hickey: when it was finished, the recipients didn’t just need a little makeup; they needed a transfusion. And the vampires could induct new members into their fraternity, making their ranks swell without limit. And they could also kill anybody they wanted to.

So the dam burst as the entertainment industry spewed forth an unending torrent of bloodsucking fun, and here we are with the next generation immersed in vampire lore. The hottest movie series focuses on the love affair between a human female and her vampire boyfriend, which eventually leads to marriage. The vampires are opposed by werewolves, whose human incarnations are reminiscent of bikers. In other vampire flicks, the vampiric condition is not the result of a foul bargain with Satan, but is a blood infection, like septicimia, with the possibility of being cured (there’s a Nobel Prize in Medicine for you).

So where will this all lead?

Life imitates art. Given the explosive progress in molecular biology, we can anticipate the groundbreaking scientific article “Using Stem Cells to Create Vampires.” This discovery will be immediately commercialized, and every piercing and tatoo parlor will add a vampirization service.

But it won’t be all bad. A large number of the transformees will be teenaged boys. Do you know how much a non-vampiric teenage boy eats? You need a conveyor belt from the supermarket to your refrigerator to keep one fed. But a vampire doesn’t eat groceries – he eats the neighbors. Your food bill will drop precipitously, and the guy next store will no longer be in a position to borrow your lawnmower.

And zombie parlors can’t be far behind.

That’s Latin for “Who guards the guardians themselves, ” a quaint Roman rhetorical question. In addition to its disquieting portent, it leads on to a series of equally disturbing questions, viz.: “Who guards the guardians who guard the guardians?” And “Who guards the guardians who guard the guardians who guard the guardians?” etc., ad nauseum, ad infinitum. Well, maybe not infinitum. Eventually you run out of people to do the guarding, or anything else, for that matter; there are only about six billion people on the planet, including people incompetent to guard anyone, such as children under eighteen months and Libertarians. And long before you hit the magic six billion figure, almost everybody is watching somebody else, sort of like in Nazi Germany, or Soviet Russia, or the United States since the passage of the Patriot Act.

It might be possible to break this infinite series if there were one level of guardians in this hierarchy who didn’t need watching. Who might that be?

I know, I know, teacher, the FBI! Remember J. Edgar Hoover who started the whole thing? Remember Elliot Ness, who got Alphonse (call me Al) Capone? Wrong answer. The FBI agent assigned to get Whitey Bulger ended up in the slammer himself for authorizing Whitey to make several hits on inconvenient individuals. And just this week, The Telegraph (a British newspaper that serves the same furnction in Merrie Olde England as do The New York Post and the National Enquirer in the United States) got hold of some internal disciplinary files from the FBI’s Bureau of Professional Reponsibility indicating that various agents were dating drug dealers, sending nude pictures to an ex-boyfriend’s wife, sending dirty texts to fellow agents, collecting child pornography, and shooting a neighbor’s dog. Looks like these folks definitely need some custodes to custode them.

Well, who’s higher than the FBI? How about the Secret Service? They guard the President, for God’s sake! Who could be purer? It turns out that that is not the question. The question is: who could be less pure? These guys (pardon me, people – the distaff side is also in the Service) appear to spend their time while on European and Caribbean assignments in the pursuit not of assassins, but of women and gents of the evening.

How about the ATF? Nah, they smuggle guns to the Mexican drug cartels.

How about the Border patrol? Nah, they smuggle in illegal immigrants.

OK, this general approach isn’t going to work. Let’s try something else. I have it! Let’s not guard anybody. We will rely on the basic honesty and decency of all human beings, their innate altruism, their love of all fellow creatures great and small. And if anybody is discovered doing anything bad, we tell them to stop. If they don’t, we ask them to stop again. And if they still don’t, we shoot them.